<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>How to Speed Read &#187; fast reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://speedreadingisreal.com/tags/fast-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://speedreadingisreal.com</link>
	<description>Speed Reading Is Real. Here&#039;s How to Start.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 21:19:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Naturally Fast Readers&#8221; vs &#8220;Speed Readers&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://speedreadingisreal.com/2009/08/naturally-fast-readers-vs-speed-readers/</link>
		<comments>http://speedreadingisreal.com/2009/08/naturally-fast-readers-vs-speed-readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen M.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General Speed Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speed reading techniques]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://speedreadingisreal.com/?p=198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some places, it seems that &#8220;speed reading&#8221; is seen as less valuable or less credible than &#8220;natural fast reading&#8221;. People seem to believe that the two are vastly different, and that &#8220;natural reading&#8221; is somehow better. The reason for this is obvious. &#8220;Natural fast reading&#8221; takes years and years to develop, whereas &#8220;speed reading&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some places, it seems that <em>&#8220;speed reading&#8221;</em> is seen as less valuable or less credible than <em>&#8220;natural fast reading&#8221;</em>. People seem to believe that the two are vastly different, and that &#8220;natural reading&#8221; is somehow better.</p>
<p>The reason for this is obvious. &#8220;Natural fast reading&#8221; takes years and years to develop, whereas &#8220;speed reading&#8221; only takes a few hours. Based on this, one can deduce that &#8220;natural fast reading&#8221; is MORE REAL, and MORE VALID.</p>
<p>If it takes one group of people their whole life to develop a skill, and it takes the second group only a few hours, then surely the second group is lying, cheating, and deceitful!</p>
<p>These sorts of irrational arguments are simply caused by ignorance. The people that make these claims simply do not understand what speed reading really is.</p>
<p>The truth is, there is no practical difference between the way &#8220;speed readers&#8221; read and the way &#8220;naturally fast readers&#8221; read. So really, &#8220;naturally fast readers&#8221; are speed reading without even realizing it.</p>
<p>The difference is in the way the two groups learned the techniques. One group spent years and years unconsciously progressing their reading ability and slowly adopting efficient reading techniques&#8230; while the other group simply learned the techniques from something like the Speed Reading Manual, and adopted them right away.</p>
<p>One group slowly got better at reading through countless hours of practice, while the other group took the shortcut and learned the techniques from a reliable resource.</p>
<p>A lot of people see &#8220;speed reading&#8221; as a type of cheating. They think it&#8217;s not entirely REAL, or VALID. They see it as a cheap workaround to actually developing a skill. Well, that&#8217;s PARTLY true! Speed reading is a cheap, fast, and effective way to learn how to read quickly &#8211; but that doesn&#8217;t make it any less real, or any less useful than &#8220;the natural way&#8221;.</p>
<p>Speed reading is a shortcut. It&#8217;s a cost-effective solution. You don&#8217;t have to spend years of your life slowly increasing your reading speed through practice. With the <a href="http://www.speedreadingisreal.com/speed-reading-manual/" target="_self">Speed Reading Manual</a>, you can learn the best techniques NOW, and start using them RIGHT AWAY.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.speedreadingisreal.com/speed-reading-manual/" target="_self">Click here to learn more about the Speed Reading Manual</a>, so that you can start speed reading today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://speedreadingisreal.com/2009/08/naturally-fast-readers-vs-speed-readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
